BBC: Four dead in Russian strike on Kursk school, Ukraine says

This BBC’s headline and article are structured to blame only the Russian side for the missile hit on a boarding school full of Russian people in the Russian territory of Kursk, currently under Ukrainian occupation.

Why were these Russian people in that school, in an area which is constantly under fire, the Russian army advancing to retake the territory? Ukraine occupies this town where still Russians live or are held: why are they not evacuated? It smells like a hostage taking, with civilian shields, aiming to stop or to slow down the Russians who will certainly retake Kursk. So far Russia has not bombed the Ukrainians into the ground, because of Russian civilians present.

Only with one sentence the BBC mentions that the Russians claim that it was a Ukrainian missile that hit the school. Is this not a reasonable claim to elaborate on? Why the BBC does not report that the Russians already indicted the Ukrainian commander responsible for the hit?

The BBC mentions that the school was about to be evacuated: only the Ukrainian side had a reasonable interest to hinder the evacuation or to destroy the target full of Russians.

“As long as it takes” … to push the war … BBC.

...