The Guardian: Russia is at war with Britain and US is no longer a reliable ally, UK adviser says

The Guardian published under its top headline a very dangerous interview with Fiona Hill. Choosing the headline as “Russia at war with UK” is one of the most dangerous headlines produced since WWII, which means that the Guardian forces the public to consider that WWIII is on its way.

Time to stop such lethal jounalistic nonsense.

Fiona Hill, during Trump’s first term, was a Russia advisor to the Trump Administration. She previously worked for the Obama/Biden Administration.

She was a key witness in the first Impeachment of Trump, the UkraineGate. She was the Democrats’, the Obama/Biden main instrument to push for UkraineGate. She was and is an anti-Trump activist. And she was a lesson for Trump during his first term not to omit those higher rank officials of (the deep state) the Obama/Biden regime and to fire them all. Hill worked from inside against Trump … and the Guardian omits this very important fact to tell the public.

Now, in an attempt to further discredit her former boss, Hill gave this interview.

Hill is advisor to the Starmer Cabinet. She reports on Russia related matters, her main subject. She claims to be a Russia specialist, working from outside Russia, from the US still.

Now, the Guardian’s headline is misleading as well. Hill did not say plainly that “Russia is in war with the UK”, she said instead: “The Russian leader, she argues, sees the fight in Ukraine as “part of a proxy war with the United States”.

Hill points to the Russian claims, since beginning of the war in Ukraine, that this war is a proxy war. But she omits to say that the Trump Administration admitted that it is, indeed, a proxy war, it’s ‘Biden’s War’, said Trump, US Foreign Secretary Rubio and many others at many occasions.

There is therefore, no doubt that this Ukraine war is a proxy war – the main initiator, the US, is confirming and admitting it publicly. The UK has a bit of reluctance to confirm it and stays with the glorious parole that ‘the UK is helping Ukraine to defend itself’. The public has learned otherwise now, even if the Guardian wants to omit this main war matter in its article. The public knows that it is a proxy war and that dangerously the US, UK and some European governments support and continue it.

Fiona Hill may be right because the more the UK is involved in this proxy war, the more the UK is waging war on Russia. But she must add: the UK is free to set its own limits to wage a proxy war on Russia. And she needs to add as well: the more the proxy war intensifies, the more the UK’s security situation worsens. Yes, that’s her main advise to the UK:

Hill claims that the UK is in a very difficult situation between the two superpowers, the US and Russia. On the one hand, the UK is involved in a proxy war against Russia, on the other hand the UK cannot rely on the aid and protection of the US against Russia. She even accuses Trump to favor his country’s own wellbeing over the UK’s. Strange accusation,  as it should be normal for the US to follow first its own interests, in particular, if the UK government dangerously intensifies its role in the proxy war, against Trump’s demands, or even thinks hasardeurly about sending own troops to the ground.

Donald Trump understood it well. The proxy war launched by Obama/Biden has reached its limits. The limits have already been passed recently by the ‘proudly’ styled Operation Spiderweb when spies attacked Russia’s nuclear bomber fleet with smuggled drones from inside Russia – a coordinated, Russia-wide attack on several nuclear bomber sites with sophisticated satellite support from the West. Trump immediately had a phone call with Putin to declare that this was not done by the US and Putin did not further act on the US – a likely nuclear retaliation was avoided by the phone call between the two leaders in the last moment.

Of course, it would be in the Ukrainian regime’s promoted self- interest if the US and Russia entered into a direct conflict … but Trump and Putin will not – and human kind has a chance to survive.

The Ukrainian regime is at its end. Terrible things will happen till their collapse. Hill knows it and warns of what might happen if the US and Russia do not act cautiously as they have done after the Operation Spiderweb. But why she does not warn the UK’s government of a further involvement in this proxy war?

And Trump now says because of the Operation Spiderweb, ” Russia has the justification to bomb the hell out of Ukraine”. And Trump probably hopes that Russia will not hit as hard on any helpers which the Operation Spiderweb had within other Western intelligence agencies or governments. But Trump loudly gives a green light to Russia to “bomb the hell out of Ukraine”.

The US will, supposedly, not anymore protect its allies if they act dangerously and if their idiotic actions may provoke a Russian conventional or nuclear retaliation. But still Putin reserves the right to retaliate and to hit hard on those responsible for Operation Spiderweb – at a time and in a way as Putin thinks necessary. And Trump says it’s ok.

Fiona Hill is a UkraineGater, probably a RussiaGater, a Obama/Biden regime member and therefore, certainly also a strategist behind Project Ukraine, which is the NATO eastward expansion into Ukraine, and therefore, a reason for and the origin of the war in Ukraine. Project Ukraine was designed to encircle Russia, to bring NATO’s arms and armies to the border of Russia, a direct threat to Russia. It failed, but the conflict intensifies with the leftist news and activists to call for war on Russia.

Sometimes it seems that the war in Ukraine is used in the same way as RussiaGate and UkraineGate, to attack the Trump Administration, as the longer it takes to settle the Ukraine conflict, the more difficult it is for Trump to run successfully his government. He has much more to do. Ukraine and Russia have been the arguments and points of attack on Trump since Trump declared for the first time his candidature for presidency in 2016. And it continues, supported by some Western governments but at the horrible expenses of the Ukrainian people, and as well as of Russia which will face generations of hatred from its Slavic neighbor as well as from Western ideological writers and populists.

And it is Trump’s only and best option to completely withdraw urgently from Ukraine, to abandon Project Ukraine and let it collapse. He still has time – the next US elections are in one year and all will be settled till then. The collapse will trigger many terrible consequences, even possibly further and larger military actions in Europe and the Ukrainian population will suffer most. The responsibility lies with those who want to continue the proxy war. But the US withdrawal and a rapid collapse of Ukraine will end the war, will terminate at once the proxy war’s killing and destruction. And it will avoid risks of a nuclear confrontation between the US and Russia. It will be the best outcome for the UK as well … or is the UK really seeking war with Russia without it’s big brother’s protection?